Some people think they have right to use as much freshwater as they want. Others believe governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is limited resource. Discuss both views and give your option.
Fresh water is one the most crucial parts of every human life, therefore whether or not the government could impose to limit water use has become a widely-discussed issue. In this essay, I will discuss the debate and give my concluding view.
On the one side, those who support the role of government claim that the authority have a responsibility to assure society get water availability evenly. They perceived that infrastructure like pump and storage cisterns built by government would lead to users receive adequate freshwater properly. For instance in many remote parts of sub-Saharan Africa, achieved could the provision of groundwater be. Furthermore, proponents of this view point out the capitalization of water by the company must be prevented. They cite that the privatization of water will undermine many problems including the high price of water which must be paid by inhabitant.
On the other hand, though, the opponents of state-run water say that restricting fresh water access could be argued a human rights infringement. For example, in most of the agricultural countries, the fresh water supplied to the community through which the public irrigation system is made is limited only few hours. Conversely, industrial sectors are given a 24 hour affordability. This could be a prove that the rights of the poor are being marginalized. Moreover, the supporters of the human rights of using water freely critics some cases related to mismanagement, bureaucracy, and corruption in government public water systems. For some extent, private water companies can provide more professional management. They successfully reduced the amount of water lost to leaks, theft, and inaccurate measurement in some areas water unavailable.
To conclude, it seems to me that constraining water use is worth implementing by government because of the positive impacts that the citizen may gain to get sufficiency of water properly. This is as long as government remains keeping the human rights particularly for marginal society and running the professional management.
- University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think they have right to use as much freshwater as they want. Others believe governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is limited resource. Discuss both views and give your option. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...al parts of every human life, therefore whether or not the government could impose to limit wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... a 24 hour affordability. This could be a prove that the rights of the poor are being m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41795665635 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14294402963 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585139318885 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.925359263 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265480783013 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823924799936 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502936558843 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165347654649 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403032031159 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.