Writing by hand with a pencil or pen is a waste of time. Children should only be taught to type on a keyboard
Nowadays, the role of technologies is highly appreciated by human beings. It is hard to imagine one's life without modern types of technologies. They have become a part of our everyday lives. However, I believe that too much concentration on technologies despite convenience gives negative results for the following reasons.
First of all, writing by hand increases the works of the brain's system. I believe that writing by hand improves the creative skills of children. Since childhood it is important for parents to teach and educate their children and improvement of writing skills can play a significant role in their lives. For example from focusing on handwriting a child can increase his concentration on different subjects, creative skills such as writing stories can be added. It is simply important for children to see what actually they write.
Secondly, excessive time on a keyboard or on any kind of items can affect on their eyes. As we all know, technological items usually spread harmful lights. Obviously, children's eyes can be harmed by those lights. Thus, it is important to reduce amount of time on using cellphones, ipads and other items. In my opinion, children should not only be taught by keyboards. By spending time on those items they will be deprived from creative and writing skills.
Evidently, when there is no light it is easy to use notes, but if children are taught to write only by keyboards then it will bring only issues. No one cancel old methods of writing, people have used these methods for many decades and I consider that people can combine old and new methods.
Additionally, writing by hand gives convenient possibilities to increase children's accuracy. Therefore, I definitely think that people should not cancel old version of teaching of children. Thus, I believe that combination of two systems of methods can show positive sides from children's growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-22 | Rafid_Murshed | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-22 | memi00 | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Sadia Khan | 60 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Sadia Khan | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Sadia Khan | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... by human beings. It is hard to imagine ones life without modern types of technologi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brains'' or 'brain's'?
Suggestion: brains'; brain's
...ting by hand increases the works of the brains system. I believe that writing by hand ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... a keyboard or on any kind of items can affect on their eyes. As we all know, technologic...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, kind of, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10256410256 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81829749831 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7899393311 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285564509431 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885986126867 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821199755724 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142820337414 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710421748653 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.