In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Hitherto, rapid globalization has resulted the demand for using high-tech devices, and the question of whether the benefits of auto vehicles dominate the drawbacks or not has been raising public attention. While many people lament that auto conveyances will mark the critical milestone of technology developments, I oppose this view by giving some rational evidence.
There is no doubt that non-driver devices have numerous foreseeable advantages. Convenience is one of the advantages that we cannot overlook; whereas current conveyances can only be controlled by humans, future devices allow us to be free while moving. We can utilize that leisure time to finish our work instead of driving. On top of that, these modern vehicles can map out the safest and fastest itinerary, which can reduce the rate of accidents. The most vivid example of using these conveyances is in America, where there are some cars that can drive without the physical strength of humans, though they are still in the experimental stage.
Although these mentioned benefits seem to be rational, they may put human beings at risk in some ways. It is conspicuous that we are expecting too much for this type of conveyance, the fact that these immediate advantages luminate tons of far-reaching drawbacks. The most obvious disadvantage is that, because vehicles are entirely dependent on technology, some hackers can break in and change our route, taking us to their destination for personal reasons, such as kidnapping or robbing us of our money. Furthermore, even a tiny error in the system can affect our non-driver vehicles, and then put us in danger of being injured. Another reason why this mode of transportation has many disadvantages is that it can have a negative impact on the country's economy. Meanwhile, in this day and age, there are so many drivers that an increase in the number of electrical drivers will raise the unemployment rate.
To summarize, unless our society reaches its pinnacle of development, the benefits of auto conveyances will outweigh the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- Food product labels should contain detailed information about that food To what extent do you agree or disagree to this opinion What might be the most important information for food labels 84
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 56
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...demand for using high-tech devices, and the question of whether the benefits of auto vehicles dominate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, may, so, still, then, whereas, while, no doubt, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19879518072 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89534141114 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605421686747 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8518020922 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173992835397 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537237755218 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379493164231 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974285607388 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222937006456 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.