In your opinion, what has been the most significant transportation innovation of the past 200 years?
For the past 200 years, humans have continuously had lots of inventions about transports with a view to decreasing the difficulty in travelling. And the most crucial kind in transport certainly be trains - the longest and may be the biggest vehicles - on account of two main reasons below.
Trains can carry a whale of freight and passengers. The trains have many cars and they are divided up into passengers’ cars and goods’ cars so as to be safer and easier for people to get on and off the trains. Furthermore, by this way, it makes either people being on trains feel comfortable or cars seem to be spacious to contain stuff. Compared with horse wagons in the past, trains definitely had more convenience in conveying a huge amount of freight and people. It was impossible to bring tons of goods and too many people in one trip until the birth of the train changed everything.
In addition, in terms of their productivity, the trains are very efficient. Initially, the trains only traveled during the day because it was actually dangerous to travel at night - no lamps could serve them to run in the dark of nights. Not until headlamps for trains were invented have the trains travelled all the day. Going along with this, they ran a hundred times as fast as those transports at the same time, so it took less time to go.Trains were the only transport which helped European delivery goods from the country to other countries in Europe in the 1800s - 1900s.
In conclusion, it seems to be a revolution in transport innovation when people come up with the trains. Throughout many centuries, the trains have never lost their significance in travelling. It is believed that this transport will be advanced and increase in quality within the next few years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-03 | minttsw | 42 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | minttsw | 62 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | Radioactive- | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-26 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
| 2015-09-14 | paymanaz | 86 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...p into passengers’ cars and goods’ cars so as to be safer and easier for people to get o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Trains
...e same time, so it took less time to go.Trains were the only transport which helped Eu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, if, may, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8125 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6702507521 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3273805858 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093853020866 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343594184559 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040180437573 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742761498248 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543244750781 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.