The bar Chart shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organizations. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given bar graph depicts the information about the amount of funding invested by the organizations on their resources buildups such as machinery, infrastructure, human resources, and research.
Comparing the data provided in the graphical form shows that organization B has spent the maximum amount on building their resources, whereas organization C spent the least to do the same. Funding spent by all other organizations is almost comparable.
Organization A, D, and E has spent maximum money on their infrastructure compared to Organization B and C. Money spent by the organization ‘A’ on infrastructure is the third-highest amount spent on a resource by any organization.
Organization B has spent the maximum amount of money to provide training to their staff. Money spent by organization B for doing the same is highest compared to any other organization or on any other resources buildup. The same organization has spent almost 1.6 billion euros on research which is the second-highest amount spent by any organization on a resource.
The minimum amount spent by any organization on a resource is 0.6 euro approx, which is spent by organization D for research.
Overall, almost 5.8 billion euros were spent by organization B, which makes him the biggest spender in all four organizations, and approximately 3.2 billion euros spent by organization D, Which is the minimum spent amount by any organization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | Vanya Sharma | 61 | view |
- The bar Chart shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organizations Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below show the people s tea or coffee buying habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- Bar Graph 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... any other organization or on any other resources buildup. The same organization has spen...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32258064516 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45746999116 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451612903226 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8239954962 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159965021671 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991804553587 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282681140698 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117288554067 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200633612309 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.