The chart below show the people s tea or coffee buying habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below show the people's tea or coffee buying habits in five Australian cities.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
.

The Bar chart illustrates the data of consumption of liquid beverages such as tea or coffee by the people of some major cities of Australia and whether the beverages are freshly made or instant. The data shown in the chart is of last four weeks.
Overall, the chart depicts that moreover half of the city residents visited a cafe or a restaurant in last four weeks to buy a beverage which is mostly coffee whether it is freshly prepared or instantly made. however, in all the five cities, people prefer to consume the instant coffee rather than freshly made one. Interestingly, only in Adelaide, number of people who bought coffee, that too instant one, is slightly higher than the people who visited the cafe meanwhile nowhere else people seem to do that.

In Hobart, maximum number of people bought instantly made coffee which is approximately 55 percent of the city population however, in Sydney only 45 percent of residents bought instant coffee. Whereas, in Melbourne, Adelaide and Brisbane, number of residents who bought the same are in between 45 to 55 percent.

Consumption of fresh coffee is significantly lower than the instantly prepared one. In case of Sydney, large number of people chose it while in Brisbane least number of people preferred to drink the fresh one. only 35 to 45 percent of residents of all five cities preferred freshly made coffee. This is the approximate figures because the graph shows that the number of people are even slightly lesser than 35 in case of Brisbane and Adelaide and none of the city crosses 45 percent mark.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-29 MinyiChu 67 view
2023-10-04 MinyiChu 56 view
2023-08-15 anhalice 67 view
2023-08-11 shalin63 67 view
2022-09-16 Dida18 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... is freshly prepared or instantly made. however, in all the five cities, people prefer ...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
...eople preferred to drink the fresh one. only 35 to 45 percent of residents of all fi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93632958801 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55091650588 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449438202247 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1116079571 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148125562966 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676362087896 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335625912173 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102570977575 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350774388453 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.