The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation

Essay topics:

The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation.

The maps provide information about how a student housing complex has changed over time, from 2010 to now.

Overall, the structure has been completely restored, including significant improvements to the student bedrooms and grounds. In addition, the renovation has resulted in the construction of extra entrances.

According to the schematics, there were just three study rooms in this student residence in 2010. However, two more are now being constructed in the vicinity. As a consequence, the horizontal corridor and the living room were destroyed in order to accommodate the alterations.

Furthermore, due to the enlargement of the bathroom and the construction of the new ensuite bathroom, the hall was substantially reduced. In addition, the original kitchen was expanded to serve as both a kitchen and a gathering room. Nonetheless, the vertical corridor and the wall that used to separate the hall and that vertical corridor were destroyed as a result of these changes. Furthermore, the south garden was demolished and rebuilt with a parking lot that links to the north garden directly.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-11 hahoaan 84 view
2024-11-10 Giang Tran 56 view
2024-11-09 Giang Tran view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, in addition, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43604651163 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10734466384 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2841847802 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131783036926 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447334697405 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771313459022 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958749095658 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987134632825 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.