The line graph below represents total number of carbon dioxide CO2 emitted by particular person in four countries, United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal in three different time frames from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, It shows that United Kingdom has higher number of people who emit CO2 whereas, In Portugal lowest number of people are recorded to emit CO2 as compared to other three countries.
In 1967 a singe person in United Kingdom emitted almost 11 metric tones of CO2 and gradually declined to nearly 8 tones in 2007. However, In Sweden at the beginning close to 9 tones of CO2 was emitted by a single person but than later in 1977 almost 11 tones of CO2 was emitted by a particular person which almost reached to the same level of United Kingdom in 1977. Sweden gradually declined later on and reached to almost 5 metric tones per person in 2007.
Italy in 1967 roughly 4.2 tones of oxygen was emitted by a person but it increased accordingly. It almost reached 6.2 tones in 1987 and increased up to
a point where it was stable in both the year 1997 and 2007 which was merely 7.5 tones emitted by a single person. The lowest level of CO2 emitted by a single person was recorded in Portugal which was nearly 2 tones in 1967 but later it increased gradually to almost 5 tones in 1997. Furthermore, It reached to roughly 5.1 metric tones in 2007.
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say that self employment is better than a job in a company or an institution Discuss both modes of work and give your own opinion 73
- Governments spend a lot of money on public celebrations such as national holidays and public festivals Some people say that the government spends too much on this and that they should use this money on other useful things Do you agree or disagree Give rea 87
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below represents total number of carbon...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xide CO2 emitted by particular person in four countries, United Kingdom Sweden It...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60655737705 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3511877527 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409836065574 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.583770613 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.888888889 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20167503113 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114107571221 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673414288246 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138136253778 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787554361759 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.