There are many arguments showing that students are suggested to study every subject available at school, whereas others indicating that they should brush up on subjects that interest them. From my point of view, I believe that children should learn the basis for all subjects but pay more attention to those that they are good at.
On the one hand, students are supposed to study fundamental knowledge. It is believed that to learn everything is better than to learn nothing, which means that obtaining lessons only enrich their intelligence and everything that students might help them someday. For example, knowing which nutrients your food contains could assist people to plan up their menu for a day or studying Physics could allow them to use knowledge to fix electric currents in their household. Contrastingly, some students from the United States fail to understand basic knowledge such as geography and history, which eventually results in racist stereotypes, misunderstandings and discrimination. Finally, concentrating on every subject may be a positive opportunity for students to achieve higher average scores.
On the other hand, it is recommended that children should focus on their biased courses. Studying what students love not only boosts their motivation and productivity but also leads to improvement in their academic level. A student who is obligated to study what he cannot understand could soon lose his interest in that subject and fail to achieve high marks. Moreover, it is believed that being specialised in the subjects students love could orientate them towards suitable occupations. Admittedly, many high schools for gifted students, especially in Vietnam, have educated several potential students, and many of them have achieved awards in national and international academic contests, which develops their personal skills, gives them chances to broaden not only their knowledge but also their future and assists them to choose the right profession.
In conclusion, I would argue that while students should obtain knowledge from every subject, they are recommended to focus more on their favourite ones.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 76
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 73
- Many people still believe that riding a bicycle is the best way to get to places What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a bicycle these days 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48640483384 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83467737263 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570996978852 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.2649029364 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.692307692 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210771578015 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878608881455 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873687982125 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168346950244 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11550126398 0.056905535591 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.