Creativity children and technnology
With the advent of technology, many dimensions of humankind have been changed. While some psychologists are of the opinion that technology has adverse effects on children, some others play devil's advocates and argue that technology is an excellent help for increasing the creativity of children. In my view, technology has had tremendous positive impacts on children's creativity for two main reasons.
First and foremost, creativity has a direct relationship with the efficiency degree of learning. Take mathematics as an example. If a child does not learn mathematics formulas or their implications, he will not be able to solve an even simple problem with them. Now technology comes up as a practical solution, but how. the internet which is one of the most significant aspects of technology, provides students a wide variety of information resources. For instance, there are a noticeable number of specialized courses in many different fields, such as chemistry, biology, algebra, and many others. As a result, children can use them to learn their lesson materials by focusing on their weaknesses. For example, when I was ten years old, I had a serious problem with physics, and I could not learn its formulas and the usages of Its different graphs in school, so I enrolled in an online physics course by concentrating on my difficulties, like graphs and formulas, and eventually from that time I have had a creative mind for physics problems.
Furthermore, in my estimation, music is an effective way, which boosts creativity. For instance, when I was a child, I did not have access to great music masterpieces, and I had to participate in an opera or a symphonic orchestra, which was holden once or twice a year. Nevertheless, nowadays, children can listen to Tchaikovsky or Beethoven's masterpieces how many times they want and whenever they want with the aid of technology. Besides, researches have exposed that children whose parents play classical music for them in their childhood period will have a higher job position in their future than those whose parents do not.
To put it in a nutshell, I believe that technology has helped kids in many was to become more creative. First, by providing a wide variety of resources, and second, by providing easily accessible means for listening to classical music.
- The reading provides some critics against buzzing advertising which is a tactic that does not let other people know the buzzer is hired to advertise However the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all First the a 70
- what are the qualities of a good university develop your position using illustrations and reasons 60
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Do you agree or disagree 70
- why do people travel 60
- theatere 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...es up as a practical solution, but how. the internet which is one of the most signi...
^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ceable number of specialized courses in many different fields, such as chemistry, biology, alg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13720316623 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05023463504 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572559366755 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0028996922 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.529411765 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14444840533 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458620887173 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688145538262 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953348779058 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883302528388 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.