Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to work in a larger company than a small one.
It is obvious that the development of the modern world leads to a proliferation of several businesses. Direct proportionately, novices are struggling to opt for an appropriate company that will adhere to them for their whole future, which, in fact, depends on the notion of each person. I and a multitude of advocates lean on the idea that it is better to work for a large company.
First of all, that a large company is much more prestigious and renowned is a plus point toward applicants. A large corporation has had a long time to ameliorate itself as well as build its own reputation. As a result, applicants are satisfied with the certain fringe benefits that a large company brings back, which means that their future careers will be more stable if they are admitted to a huge association. On the contrary, a small company does not guarantee applicants’ future inasmuch as it may go out of business someday. If this is to happen, workers may become unemployed and suffer from a lack of money. Consequently, not only workers themselves but also their families may have to live an austere and miserable life.
Secondly, the gigantic resources of a large organization allow workers to show their strength to the fullest extent. Modern and expensive equipment is installed to facilitate workers’ productive proportion. For example, Google’s workplace has a wide range of rooms including PC rooms, entertainment rooms, gym, and so on, and its employees are encouraged to work when they relish and how they prefer. Needless to say that only a large company with excessive funds can build all of these places to support workers, giving them the most convenient environment to work in. Furthermore, net-working enlargement is one of the benefits of a big company. Here, workers meet and befriend a multitude of adept people from whom they can learn and get advice.
Finally, advancement in a small company is by no means facile as most people expect. In order to be promoted, diligent employees have to wait for a vacancy from someone resigning or deliberately leaving or hope that someone creates a new position, which happens less often in a small company. Unfortunately, employees have no other choice but to leave the company if they are not happy with their current position or depressed as to how slowly they are promoted.
In conclusion, a large company assures the stability of their workers’ future life along with providing them with a myriad buttress to expand their ability, while a small one might not be able to support its workers as they anticipate.
- Do you agree or disagree that the most important thing that the government can do in improving health care is to clean the environment 81
- When you face a difficult problem in life what do you feel is the best way to solve it asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem finding information about the problem using the Internet taking a long time to think about the problem 80
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- Schools are the only place to receive true education Do you agree or disagree 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work in a larger company than a small one 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'resigns'.
Suggestion: resigns
...have to wait for a vacancy from someone resigning or deliberately leaving or hope that so...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed as to how slowly they are promoted. In conclusion, a large company assures t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94919168591 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9089022707 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54272517321 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5190161856 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.789473684 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7894736842 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3157894737 5.45110844103 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145611334059 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444826696141 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431156258335 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086737618736 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223081966805 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.