Going green is a good choice or not
Going green recently has become a new phenomenon with great support from not only individuals but also a myriad of companies and factories in the world. Due to great benefits, the writer firmly believes that this movement seems to be a wise choice. However, the professor is at loggerhead of this statement by pointing out some sparks making this trend undesirable.
First, the author expresses support for going green in light of its positive impact on the environment. It is stated that the process of environmental degradation can be slowed down with the application of going green. The argument, by contrast, is opposed by the lecturer since the deteriorated environment is the result of thousands of individuals; the number surely must terrify humans. He also fumes that without the involvement of a multitude of global companies and residents, this correction would never become true.
Second, company profit is another reason to publicize going green. When the motor and image of a certain company links with an eco-friendly message, this obviously facilitates the soaring growth of that firm. Nevertheless, the speaker is at the opposite view. He rebuts that in order to go green, there would be a surge in the manufacturing cost, which leads to the following swell in final price to consumers. This negates the sales of companies fiercely inasmuch as buyers are unlikely to pay higher for the same products.
Last but not least, the reading cites advantages that both citizens and companies can obtain through employing going green. Solar panels are considered a suitable example to clarify for this point since the spending on electricity is likely to plummet along with the efficiency in shielding the environment. In opposition, the professor does not advocate this statement. He asserts that the spending outweighs the saving owing almost completely to the high installation and maintenance costs, which become considerable factors for not going green.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 70 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | KEVA | 88 | view |
- The map below show the changes that took place in the town at the seaside resort of Laguna beach between 1950 and 1990 56
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 59
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26349206349 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87080683293 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9690883105 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201515970258 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726614121317 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841874845042 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131383655908 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287096644285 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.