The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart
shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people
think the costs of adult education should be shared.
Write a report for a university lecturer, describing the information shown below.
The chart illustrates the findings of an adult education survey. The horizontal bar graph gives information about the reasons behind adults deciding to study(Interest in subject, To gain qualification, etc.). The pie charts puts forward poeple's expectance of how the cost for education be shared among taxpayer, individual, and the employer.
Overall, majority of adults i.e. 40%, go for study due to their interest in the subject. On the other hand, only 9% have the reason as "To meet people".
People believe that about 40% of the cost of education should be paid by the individual and about 25% should come from taxpayer.
Exactly 38% of the adults decide to study further to gain qualifications needed for their respective fields. 22% feel the need to study as it would be helpful
for them in their current job. There is an equal percentage of people who study to improve prospects of promotion and the people who enjoy studying, i.e. 20%.
There are 12% of people who study as they want to be able to change jobs.
Looking at the reasons of adults deciding to study further, it is quite clear that a good amount of them are related to being able to change jobs or get higher pay through promotions, which makes sense that 35% of the cost of education should be shared by the employer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-19 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | Hypnogogic | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | marytran2000 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | Song Thư | view | |
| 2022-12-05 | ĐNH | 78 | view |
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 39
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...t in subject, To gain qualification, etc.. The pie charts puts forward poeples exp...
^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n subject, To gain qualification, etc.. The pie charts puts forward poeples expecta...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83111111111 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62302812475 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582222222222 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7923201471 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8181818182 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354533053285 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132625132058 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811789757419 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150504940221 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921474665219 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.