The bar chart compares the top five mobile phone brands in terms of global sales in three years 2009, 2011 and 2013.
Overall , Samsung, Apple, ZTE saw the upward trend over the period shown while Nokia and LG experienced the opposite trend. In 2009 and 2011 , Nokice ranked the first , but then it was replaced by Samsung in 2013.
In 2009, 225 million Samsung phones were sold while Nokia sold nearly 450 million phones. Two years later, the number of Samsung phones being sold increased to 325 million while Nokia witnessed a slight decrease of global phone sales but still ranked the first brand with 410 million phones. However, Samsung became the most attractive brand in 2013, with 450 million phones sold while the figure for Nokia dropped to 250 million
In 2009 , Apple and ZTE sold under 50 million phones each while 125 million LG phones were sold. However, during the following 4 years, LG then saw a moderate decrease in the mobile phone sales, reaching 1 million in 2013 while Apple increased significantly , with 150 million phones and ZTE increased slightly with over half a million phones sold in 2013.
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- Research suggests that majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem 73
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 67
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give you 78
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hree years 2009, 2011 and 2013. Overall , Samsung, Apple, ZTE saw the upward tren...
^^
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ced the opposite trend. In 2009 and 2011 , Nokice ranked the first , but then it w...
^^
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 2009 and 2011 , Nokice ranked the first , but then it was replaced by Samsung in ...
^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... figure for Nokia dropped to 250 million In 2009 , Apple and ZTE sold under 50 mi...
^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r Nokia dropped to 250 million In 2009 , Apple and ZTE sold under 50 million pho...
^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...2013 while Apple increased significantly , with 150 million phones and ZTE increas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83854166667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14831786613 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.1578199675 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.714285714 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252922735968 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158212592589 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160833599704 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21829856211 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186874918553 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.