The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news, by age group 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The figure compares the frequency in the use of three different media of five age groups to get news every day in 2011.
Overall, radio was the most popular medium that people of all ages except the group 10-17 used while microblogging was the less common medium in all groups.
In three latter groups, more than 85% of the population in each group used radio to read the news while just under one-fifth of the population in each used microblogging. Social networking was used differently in different groups, with half the group 30-49, 40% of the group 50-64, and a quarter of the group above 65 using it.
In both groups 10-17 and 18-29, social networking was used widely by four-fifth of each group. However, the proportion of group 18-29 getting news by microblogging was over 91%, which doubled the figure for group 10-17(40%). The use of microblogging was low in both groups, at 20% and 25% in group 10-17 and group 18-29 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give you 78
- The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58694009826 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1993924217 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132017420465 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830997599102 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545177892105 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103487054057 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620414347306 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.