The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
Given are the first chart comparing the average proportion of energy consumption in Australian households categorized according to activities, and the second chart demonstrating the amount of greenhouse gas released by these activities.
As illustrated in the charts, heating generally consumes by far the largest amount of energy and plays a major role in contributing greenhouse gas emissions. Meanwhile, cooling and lighting share minimum proportions in both categories.
Specifically, Australian residents averagely allocate a massive three-quarters of energy solely for heating purpose, with 30% exclusively for water heating. The remaining of nearly 25% of energy is shared by other purposes. Particularly, the energy used for refrigeration accounts for 7%, whereas cooling and lighting activities take up merely 2% and 4% respectively, which are negligible percentages. 15% of energy is consumed by other household appliances.
Apart from being the main energy consuming factor, heating is also regarded as the major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions when nearly half proportion of household gases is attributable to this kind of activity, including 32% by water heating. In contrast, refrigeration is responsible for 14% of gases, but this figure strikingly double the amount of energy use. The minimal sum of 11% greenhouse gases is caused by cooling and lighting, and the proportion contributed by other purposes accounts for 28%.
- The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 84
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 84
- The maps below show the changes in a town in Europe after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Describe the noticeable changes in the maps 81
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the first chart comparing the average p...
^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. Meanwhile, cooling and lighting share minimum proportions in both categories. ...
^^
Line 4, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sum of 11% greenhouse gases is caused by cooling and lighting, and the proportion...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, whereas, while, apart from, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75348837209 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26766613482 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590697674419 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0098405013 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.7 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269126880622 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100914085755 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694444322007 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164693389455 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677297709963 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.