internet and children
With the advent of The internet and other related online facilities, many dimensions of our lives have been changed, and one of the most considerable dimensions is education. While some psychologists state that social networks, cell phones, and computer games have many adverse effects on children learning efficiency, some others play devil's advocate and argue that quite the contrary, they have many advantages. In my view, social networks, cell phones, and computer games have altered children's learning way in a fruitful one for two main reasons. First, the lockdown experience due to the Covid-19 proves that without the help of social networks and cell phones, children and students cannot communicate with each other, and more importantly, learn their lessons anymore. Hence, social networks, online activities, and cell phones are now a dispensable part of our lives. For example, during the lockdown, my four-year-old brother had to follow up his courses on the Telegram and download them regularly. However, he had to hand in his essays to his teachers every Friday morning. As a result, if there were not any social networks, like Telegram, most children would not have a chance to continue their school or other related activities during urgent circumstances, like Covid-19 prevalence.
Furthermore, social networks like YouTube, Coursera, and others can benefit students in many ways. For instance, a fifth-grade child who has not accessed to high-quality teachers and schools when he wants to rehearse for his TOEFL exam can use many efficient videos on YouTube and improve his language with the help of different channels which exist on it. Nevertheless, I have learned the MATLAB language, a problematic mathematic coding language, only by watching YouTube videos, and if I wanted to enroll in traditional classes near my hometown, I would have paid a great deal of money, and I would have wasted my time too. To put it in a nutshell, I believe that cell phones, online games, and social networks have more beneficial aspects than negative ones. Because children can use them under any condition whenever they want, and secondly, they can search on YouTube for many helpful videos about a variety of categories and genres, which help them meliorate their learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | prakriti malla | 85 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
- movies and televisions strongly influence the way people behave do you agree or disagree 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world
- internet and children 90
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Do you agree or disagree 70
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement at the universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2349726776 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7533989484 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568306010929 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1354325259 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.384615385 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1538461538 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114491452471 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374110452854 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410010095142 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868698840282 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577393630397 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.