Aquamarine agriculture
The article introduces the idea of aquamarine agriculture. The writer of the article focuses on the negative impacts of it, while the lecturer states that aquamarine agriculture would be a beneficial plan for the future.
Firstly, the writer of the article states that people are unaware of the location of minerals in the ocean so in order to find those minerals, large segments of ocean floors will be exploited. As a result, the sea life will be negatively impacted. However, the lecturer claims that exploiting large portions of ocean floor would not be necessary since testing small samples from different parts of the ocean will help to locate the necessary resources for aquamarine agriculture. Hence, in pursuit of searching for minerals sea lives will not be impacted.
Secondly, the writer claims that this form of agriculture will drive up sand and dust significantly, consequently the water will be polluted. Furthermore, toxic waste products will spread to different parts of the ocean and majority of the inhabitants of those areas will be affected. On the other hand, the lecturer asserts that oceans are vast and have areas similar to deserts, which are empty or sparsely populated. Additionally, in those areas waste products will not move farther, hence organisms living in seas will not be negatively affected.
Lastly, the writer feels that aquamarine agriculture will have the same fate as agriculture of land. Fish will be grown in a restricted space and this will result in a large amount of waste in a small space. Subsequently, the surrounding ecosystem will be adversely affected. In contrast, the lecturer said that fish will be grown in large areas so the waste will not accumulate, rather it will move to different areas without affecting the ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-01 | jullu | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | dl25 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | khush.furia | 68 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | arifsadi19 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 5.04856512141 376% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15120274914 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81382661964 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46735395189 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0837647439 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.071428571 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144373863584 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772457697174 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133240513953 0.0662205650399 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132235727008 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111471440768 0.0443174109184 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.