The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph compares the amounts of goods delivered in the UK in terms of four different modes of transport over the twenty-eighth-year period, from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, it is noteworthy that road was responsible for the transportation of most goods. In addition, the quantities of goods shipped by water surpassed those by rail to become the second highest by the end of the period shown.
In 1974, the amount of goods delivered by road stood at about 70 million tonnes, which was highest, compared to those by rail, at 40 million tonnes. From 1974 to 1990, while this figure for road delivery increased to nearly 80 million tonnes, there was a gradual decline of approximately 30 million tonnes in that of rail one in 1986, before rising to roughly 35 million tonnes in the year 1990. Over the next 12 years, both figures witnessed an upward trend of around 90 million and 40 million tonnes respectively.
At the beginning of the period shown, water took charge of the transportation of about 30 million tonnes, as opposed to the quantities of goods shipped by pipeline, at only around 5 million tonnes, which meant that this figure for pipeline expression was lowest among all. Over the period of 16 years, the importance of both modes of transport went up to nearly 60 million and around 22 million tonnes in the respective order mentioned. From 1990 to 1994, the figure for water remained relatively unchanged, whereas that of pipeline saw a slight decrease to 20 million tonnes. By the end of the period shown, there was a marginal fall of approximately 50 million tonnes in the amounts of goods expressed by water, before rising to more than 60 million tonnes. In the meantime, the figure for pipeline stabilized at 20 million tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-21 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 67
- In some countries more and more people becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are reasons for this How can people research this 78
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 78
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 33.7804878049 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85049833887 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72471027675 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468438538206 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0139898737 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.727272727 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1526021285 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772212223142 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109553064702 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15873027368 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145157879654 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.