The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The given line graph gives information about the amount of UK goods transported by four types of transportation namely road, water, rail, and pipeline over a period of 28 years starting from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, as can be seen from the graph, it is clear that an upward trend was seen in both these types of goods transported in the UK. In addition, the number of products shipped on the road was by far the highest during the research period, while the opposite was true for the figure for Pipeland.
In 1974, the amount of merchandise transported by road in the UK was the highest, at roughly 72 million tonnes, while the figure for rail was significantly lower, at approximately 40 million tonnes. Meanwhile, there were about 39 and 4 million tonnes of goods moved by water transportation and pipeline transportation respectively.
In 2002, the quantity of goods transported in the UK noticeably rose by 27 million tonnes to 99 million tonnes and remained the highest figure in the chart. At the same time, after fluctuating slowly, there was a slight rise to 41 million tonnes in the figure for rail, while the amount of UK products shipped by pipeline gradually increased to about 22 million tonnes. Additionally, water’s figure witnessed a remarkable climb of 26 million tonnes to 65 million tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-21 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- The table and pie charts below show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010 67
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- In the last few decades there have been more and more cases of famous people being hounded by the press Some people think that famous people in the media should have no right to privacy To what extent do you agree 67
- The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91928251121 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87244846852 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520179372197 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.9729630947 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.125 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236213758915 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125863238706 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107074682027 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176331644856 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873083671756 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.