Today, TV channels show more men's sports than women's sports. Why is this the case? Should TV channels give equal time for women's sport and men's sport?
Nowadays, men's sports have much wider coverage than women's on broadcasts. This essay will outline some driving forces behind this phenomenon and some reasons why both genders should be provided equal sports coverage.
To start with, higher profit is the primary cause for the imbalance in the number of men's and women's sports being shown on TV. First, the majority of sports viewers are men and they usually gather in groups to watch their favorite and latest competitions. Let's take football as an example. It is not uncommon for people to see a horde of young men drinking coffee and cheering in a cafeteria during football season while when meeting others, women show a great preference for talking about shopping, the trendiest products, or gossiping about celebrities and recent fights on social media. Second, in sports, male athletes play at a much higher level than females, like boxing or wrestling, men have the greater physical strength and thus making the competitions more attractive and thrilling. Therefore, when showing more TV programs about men's sports, producers can gain more money thanks to the huge number of male audiences particularly and sports lovers generally.
Nevertheless, the dominance of men's sports programs on television should not exist. TV program producers should balance the fluency of men's and women's sports performances to create and enhance gender equality in society. Thanks to it, women can feel assured that they have the same degree of importance as men and have more courage and confidence to take part in sports tournaments. Besides, nowadays, women's participation in sports is not appreciated. People tend to think female athletes are not strong and determined enough to compete with others. However, they also strive for the best and should be given full recognition to compensate for their dedication. Additionally, showing more women's programs relating to sports activities can help in gaining their reputation, thus allowing them to be involved in endorsement and earn much higher salaries, which on the other side, maybe beneficial for their country's economic growth.
In conclusion, why women's sports programs do not receive decent coverage in this day and age results from the aforementioned reasons and it is important to balance the appearance of men's and women's sports performances on TV programs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-14 | khanhchi | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | EmilyLogan | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | EmilyLogan | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-16 | aclice | 73 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack of sleep cause What can be done about lack of sleep 84
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays children watch too much TV Why is this happening and what can be done to prevent it 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...their favorite and latest competitions. Lets take football as an example. It is not ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 719, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'sport'.
Suggestion: sport
...howing more womens programs relating to sports activities can help in gaining their re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, talking about, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30666666667 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73384190391 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565333333333 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8674724319 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498487728029 0.244688304435 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174674283952 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10685599451 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333203306859 0.151304729494 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281739778126 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.