Some people prefer to work for the same company for years. Why is this? Does it bring any problems?
More and more people are comfortably settled in their workspace for many years because they are likely to be promoted to higher positions. As a result, they will lack to acquire diverse experiences and knowledge that might be able to get it at a different company.
There are some reasons why employer sticking to the same job and one of the principal factors is the ability to advance in their careers. This is particularly true in the industries that place a premium on expertise. People who worked as bureaucrats, they should stay in their current institution at least 10 years before they achieved higher positions. Moreover, there are some on-job trainings to improve competency of public servants who will occupy in particular functional job position as well as to locate competent individuals for specific job positions, health and practical tests may be administered. By conducting this, the local government would receive the best civil servant who have high competency and good morality.
The main problem face by worker due to decide of their decision not to change employment for years is that they will struggle to develop themselves to get diverse experiences and information in different workplaces. Every day, as a government worker, they give solutions to the same circumstances and challenges. Furthermore, they are unaware of current information and tend to address problems in the same manner such as people who worked in registration section always do the same tasks even though meeting different people makes them stick to only one problem.
In conclusion, because worker want to elevate to the next levels of responsibility, they are focused on their company for years then they will be unable to get varied opportunities and information from another workplaces. Perhaps, they should attend training on different subjects and conduct some researches so that they able to know the recent of science.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-08 | fatimatuzzahro | 78 | view |
- The chart below compares levels of recycling as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management in fifteen European countries 78
- The chart shows the weight assessment of inhabitants of Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 73
- It has been proposed that citizens should only consume food and drink products that have been produced in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Free time activities of the elderly in The United States from 1980 to the present 75
- The data below shows who owns Greek Sovereign Debt 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, as to, at least, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23548387097 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90814815688 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4723967561 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22348623521 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077524094194 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468571332095 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132989086219 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432649947278 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.