Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games. What are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects
These days, computers, with the high technology of Internet connections have created a big opportunity for people to easily access on a wide range of information in all over the world and a large number of children playing games on the computer. However, using computer freely without any restrictions and playing too much game caused a considerable number of problems, which can be solved only by the great endeavor from the parents and the individual of each internet users.
Having access to a wide range of information on the internet at the early age is a big opportunity for children. However, letting them playing game on the computer is not good because there are so many children spending many hours playing games and entertaining themselves with the computers. Children usually can not control themselves or recognize the negative sides of playing game, and an increase in the number of children playing computer games make the situation worse. For example, when they play games on the computer for long hours, their eyes will be affected by the green light from the screen of the computer and they could be easily short-sighted. More seriously, when the children play video games with violent characters, they would addict that and it could create in themselves a violent personality.
Therefore, the solution, which would seem to reduce the bad effects of playing games for children, is from the endeavor of parents who can control and observe closely their children’s daily activities. One way to minimize that is making timescales for children. This allows parents to balance their children’s studied and played activities, but also forces them to obey the frame of work strictly too.
There is also another less punishing way to encourage less games play. Creating outdoor activities with natural environment for children has been known as the most convenient way to improve children’s health such as swimming, hiking, jogging and going to the zoo, so that their lives would be more closely for children with nature and outside environment.
To sum up, although it is beneficial for the worldwide developments with the high technology of computers, I believe it is inevitable for the exaggerated number of children playing computer games. However, I personally think parents must take their child’s generation carefully because they are one of the most vulnerable internet users in cyberspace.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-19 | Trần Thị Phương Thúy | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | arsh wahid | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | aikzat | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | roopdeep | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | christine112 | 56 | view |
- Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Households owning and renting accommodation in England and Wales 1918 to 2011 84
- Households owning and renting accommodation in England and Wales 1918 to 2011 92
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games What are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...f information in all over the world and a large number of children playing games on the computer....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21282051282 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80536843297 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8353834339 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.214285714 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381314785026 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146511169509 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947254193925 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209540457736 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118434087883 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...f information in all over the world and a large number of children playing games on the computer....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21282051282 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80536843297 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8353834339 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.214285714 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381314785026 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146511169509 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947254193925 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209540457736 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118434087883 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.