We have observed a gradual increase of the sea level during the last decades. It is a slow increase, and despite the alarmist attitudes of some, it is nothing to be worried about. By analyzing the data and looking into the matter clearly, we can find that this is a normal process that has happened before.
Even though we have documented a rise in the polar ice melting, this isn't the reason for the increase in the sea level. That ice is already in the water, so it displaces it already. Think of ice cubes in your glass of water, when they melt it doesn't make the water from the glass spill over. The same thing happens when the ice cap melts. Since the Ice is 90% already in water, when it goes into a liquid state, nothing drastic happens.
When it comes to the source for the increase in the sea level, we just don't know where it comes from. Many scientific agencies like NASA have stated that they simply don't know from where all this new water is coming. So it is still a great unknown to us.
The author and lecturer discuss about the rise of sea level in past decade. The author of the article feels that rising of sea level in past decade is not a matter to be worried as according to author it is a normal process. Author presents three theories to defend his/her view. The lecturer disputes it by saying that it is a matter of great concern to us. Lecturer further presents reasons to dispute the author point of views.
According to the author polar ice melting is not the reason for the rise of sea level. Author defend this specific argument by saying that polar ice is already present in the sea level and by example of ice in glass of water do not displace the water, same way polar ice in sea water do not displace it. Hence, not increase the sea level. The lecturer refutes this point by explaining about the permafrost ice which is the ice present on landmass and it do not displace anything but melting of it, increase the sea level.
Secondly, author explain that source of new water is not known, even NASA failed to provide proofs for the source of new water which is causing rise in sea level. Lecturer rebukes this point by explaining that NASA already provided study that links the increase of water level due to melting of permafrost ice.
Finally, author explain us that there is ample of time for humanity to adjust rise of sea level as it is a slow process but lecturer refutes this by explaining us that permafrost ice which is melting today due to human intervention not melt for 10000 years if no intervention from the humans but it is not the case. According to lecturer this process is happening at an alarming rate and can destroy our economy as most of economy depends on cities near ocean.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-02 | Precarious | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | jullu | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | Ashritha Gumudavally | 60 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | himanshukmr234 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | cluelessme | 73 | view |
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do 77
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 70
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child Of all the dance schools in Elmtown Pirouettes has the most intensive program and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world Many of our students have gon 59
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 56
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns w 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...h is the ice present on landmass and it do not displace anything but melting of it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53184713376 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29683197849 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410828025478 0.540411800872 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5544556945 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.461538462 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145335929906 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738272511971 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061498074096 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920700763966 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249155030659 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 12.2367328918 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.