The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two figures compare the differences between the map of the cinema in 1980 and that of the present time.

Overall, it is noticeable that the majority of the infrastructures of the cinema have been relocated and increased in the number, while some places are constantly in use.

The old car park which was once opposite the entry is removed and the cinema 2 now occupies the north-west area and the cinema 3 takes up the north-east one. Other two cinemas are built in a row behind the third units, just next to the former Drinks which is replaced by the DVD shop. The new Food Drinks shop and the added relax room have been in the left side of the entry which led the Cinema 1 to moving forward.

However, the entry from 1980 is still located in the middle of the south, next to the ticket room which has been functioning up to now. The restroom remains in the same area but recently stands between the cinema 1 and cinema 2.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-28 Lotuslotus 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...st, we only had two rooms to show movies.. The ticket office is on the right side ...
^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...s a toilet. At the back of the theater, theres a parking lot. On the other hand, th...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, so, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 741.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38461538462 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30397211896 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3819870707 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.3636363636 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0763671915095 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267403244422 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326932541385 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0486884613296 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413660420691 0.0819641961636 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.53 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.