The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today.
The maps illustrate the layout of Colwich Arts Centre between 2005 and at present.
Overall, Colwich Arts Centre has undergone several alterations including the merger between two gallery rooms, the division of the meeting room, the renovation of wasteland and the establishment of new function areas. These developments have transformed the art centre into a more space-effective to serve more visitors.
On the left-hand side of the centre, the gallery has been divided into two rooms that now are found at the former site of the snack bar. Whereas the toilet has been removed to the right-hand side, the new drama studio has been added at the back of the centre which adjoining new meeting room 1. Furthermore, in 2005 the cinema and the concert hall were conducted in the same room, there are now two separate areas and cinema has been narrowed leaving more space for a new central exhibition area.
It can be seen from the maps that two gallery rooms on the right-hand side have been merged into one big room and moved to the opposite side, while the café shop is now seen next to the new gallery room. The wasteland, which dominated the art centre in 2005, has been renovated with a new stage and new area for outdoor exhibition and performance.
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- ETHANOL IS GENERATED BY CORN
- The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs 73
- social media 84
- The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 937.175257732 111% => OK
No of words: 217.0 206.0 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79723502304 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53413486133 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 127.690721649 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529953917051 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 290.88556701 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1078897804 44.8134815571 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 76.5299724578 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 16.8248392259 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 4.34317383033 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148446763952 0.216113520407 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901138344435 0.0766984524023 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872841953057 0.0603063233224 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139443686049 0.12726935374 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932353330731 0.0580467560999 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 8.37731958763 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 7.45979381443 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.