The provided diagram elucidates the innovation of Pancha Village during 2005 and 2015. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the town has a renovation with the addition of a new toad, modern amenities, and a great expansion of current residential, commercial and educational locations.
By 2015, the dirty road present in 2005 has been improved into a highway lined with road signs, electric poles, and telecommunication towers in the bottom left corner of the map. On the left side of the road, the market has developed and become more organized whereas the sizes of the homes along the road have also become larger.
To the right side of the road, in the bottom corner, the pagodas location is allowed for an additional building. Right next to the pagoda area is two homes that have been demolished and in the top right corner, the secondary school has been built and complement with the primary school. Also noticeable is that most residents only possessed access to telephones during 2005 but by 2015 satellite dishes had become more ubiquitous.
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities Therefore some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- THe chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 84
- Differences between countries are becoming less evident Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- As computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie chart shows information about world resources and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt Saudi Arabia and Canada 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pagodas'' or 'pagoda's'?
Suggestion: pagodas'; pagoda's
... of the road, in the bottom corner, the pagodas location is allowed for an additional b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...and complement with the primary school. Also noticeable is that most residents only ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02777777778 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70684432002 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.226792926 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0858941830632 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490630392258 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068560728254 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607655024778 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270050184709 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.