The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs.
Overall, cartoons program is more popular with people aged between 11 and 15 while featured films and news programs are preferred by people in the 16-20 and 21-25 age groups. Meanwhile, TV dramas are the least favorite among the three age groups.
People watching cartoons aged 11-15 accounts for 29%, compared with 19% of the 16-to 20-year-olds and 4% of the 21-to 25-year-olds. In contrast, spectators watching news programs in 16-20 and 21-25 age groups are nearly three times as much as that figure of 11-to 15-year-old people, with the figures being nearly 20% and 6% respectively. Similarly, just under a quarter of people in the 16-20 and 21-25 age groups watch featured films, as opposed to only 11% of people in the youngest age group enjoys this program.
It can be seen from the table that sports program attracts roughly 20% people aged 16-20 and 21-25, which is about 6% more than the figure for the youngest age group. Whereas TV dramas attract approximately 12% people in the 16-20 and 21-25 age groups, only 9% of 11- to 15- year-olds watch it, the percentages of spectators watching soap operas aged 16-20 and 21-25 are the same, at 20% each, more than 6% in comparison with the youngest age group.
- The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs 67
- Some people think that liking your job is more important than how much money you earn while others think that your salary is more important than how much you like your job Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today 78
- COLWICH GALLERY 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5328498564 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6418790936 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.375 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37766715969 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.249437844739 0.103423049105 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.225906850564 0.0843802449381 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.371712065752 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.268144444892 0.0819641961636 327% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.