The pie charts reveal changes in the rate of students’ status after graduating from an Australian secondary school in three separate years, 1980, 1990 and 2000. Overall, the figure for employed people witnessed an upward trend while that for the two remaining categories experienced a downward trend. Additionally, the percentage of unemployed students always possessed the lowest figure among all categories during these years surveyed.
Regarding the category of “unemployment”, there was a slight decrease with a fluctuation, with its percentage increase by 2% from 10% to 12% in the first 10 years then dropping to 8% in the last year. Although the proportion of students who pursued further education was by far the highest among all categories in the first year, which accounted for a half, this figure showed a significant decrease to 37% in 20 years later. By contrast, there was a remarkable growth in the rate of who being employed. To be exact, this percentage increase by 15% from 40% in 1980 to 55% in 2000, which was the highest position in 2000.
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 84
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The table compares the percentage of mobile phone owners using their phone features from 2006 to 2010 78
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96708440662 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6895959219 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212861909639 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894858835648 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876908589695 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157846286806 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402054767135 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.