Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers. Employers' organizations say that in a global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent. What are your view?
Nowadays, people’s opinions differ as to whether companies’ directors should be paid increments rather than others and how this can be used as an approach to recruit more talents. From my perspective, it is this policy, being a crucial method for organizations to attract the best management.
The organization’s directors should be given the right of higher payment for numerous reasons. Firstly, this amount of salary is justified for them as their high responsibility of work. This is because such people are always willing to endure heavy workloads and pressures during their working time. A director, for instance, is responsible for setting up strategies and then implementing this into practice, which plays a survival role in a company. Secondly, directors who are paid much bigger salaries are attributed to the company’s development. The more money people earn, the more job satisfaction they feel. Organizers can use this policy as a way to give directors incentives, promoting them to make more efforts and giving groundbreaking innovations, therefore being beneficial for both individuals and companies.
This payment strategy is indeed helping employers’ organizations to captivate people who are able to work as the best management. This can firstly help companies to take advantage compared with their competitors. To be exact, we are now living in a competitive market in which almost cooperation intends to attract as many high-quality talents as possible. Once giving people so impressive salaries that can satisfy them to live a financially comfortable life, talents are likely to enroll and then work for these organizations. Aside from that, payment increases could also result in quality improvements in the workforce generally. If the volume of ordinary workers has an attempt to achieve the position of director in order to earn handsome salaries, they will enhance their qualifications as well as experiences, thus progressing the common ground to higher levels of professions.
To conclude, I am convinced that providing directors with payment increments is a feasible method to attract numerous talents globally.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university What are the advantages and disadvantages 11
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
- The chart shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to a university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant 84
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Nowadays, people’s opinions differ as to whether companies’ directors should be paid inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52567975831 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17976656069 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607250755287 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1475596474 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216542210718 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716789222562 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433570224193 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129315685134 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272027187325 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Nowadays, people’s opinions differ as to whether companies’ directors should be paid inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52567975831 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17976656069 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607250755287 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1475596474 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216542210718 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716789222562 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433570224193 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129315685134 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272027187325 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.