At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity -for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to work alone or with others? Why?
In this modern day and age, creativity is of paramount importance as it can help individuals to come up with game-changing solutions to overcome difficult problems. A controversial question that might arise here is that whether people prefer to work alone relying only on their own creativity or count on others as well to solve a certain problem. Though there is no definite answer to this question, I utterly subscribe to this idea that it is better to work with others. To support this, there are several perspectives, two of dominant which, are discussed in detail in the following.
First and foremost, no matter how bright or smart an individual is, there might be people out there, who does not necessarily approach a problem for a point of view the same as him/her. Therefore, one might suffer from having blind spots that can be illuminated only throughout broadening his/her horizon. Working in close tandem with individuals in a team and benefiting from their creativity can help people to gain insight into a certain topic from another perspective. This knowledge enhancement can be an immense asset in the future in case one encounter a similar problem. I am of the strong conviction that working in a group can not only show individuals as a team player, but also can be advantageous to them in terms of accomplishing what they are looking after in a perfect fashion as the shortcomings would be enormously less in comparison to working alone.
Furthermore, working with other people and incorporating all members creativity can also save the group a significant amount of time. Nowadays, projects are becoming more and more interdisciplinary and require people with different expertise to work together. It goes without saying that some members are more creative in certain fields than others. Therefore, a good idea would be partitioning the job into several tasks and assign each to one or two member whose creativity can be counted on regarding that specific field. As a result, the whole project has the potential to turn out exceptionally novel since a wide variety of individuals each uniquely creative in their own field has made a positive contribution to solve that very problem, all these in a short amount of time and it is no secret how time is an invaluable asset in both academia and business.
To wrap it up, contemplating what was discussed above, I genuinely believe that completing projects on a team and counting on others’ creativity as well as yours would absolutely result in better outcomes. This is because more shortcomings would be fixed with the creativity of others, and because partitioning tasks in groups would save individuals a significant amount of time as each can positively impact the problem with their creativity which is a key to challenging tasks.
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- As a new teaching method professors record a video lecture in advance for students to learn and class time is used to answer questions and have discussions Do you think this is an effective way and why 73
- Some lessons for young students 5 8 years old increase their interest to learn including video games But some people believe it will distract young student What is your opinion Why 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 773, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a perfect fashion" with adverb for "perfect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...complishing what they are looking after in a perfect fashion as the shortcomings would be enormously...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...with other people and incorporating all members creativity can also save the group a si...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'member' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'members'.
Suggestion: members
...ral tasks and assign each to one or two member whose creativity can be counted on rega...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thers, and because partitioning tasks in groups would save individuals a signific...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03211991435 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98066498001 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509635974304 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4185674009 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.875 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1875 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176710745378 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638925284292 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364515790873 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115709420345 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108341521914 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.