Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies, while others argue that robots might have negative effect on society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Although there are noticeable arguments in favor of negative consequences of extending application of robots, I personally believe that robots will certainly be an inevitable part of our future world.
Current trend of using robots in vast variety fields and functions, causes some worries among pessimistic technology observers. They express that workers in manufacturing and construction sector may be replaced by robots and this automatized processes may lead unemployment rate to an impressive growth. Furthermore there are some other issues to be concern in regard of regulatory and ethical matters. As far application of Artificial intelligence is becoming more Prevalent in robotic technology, doubts about the negative outcomes and effects of smart robots on different aspects of human life are increasing. For instance some journalists have begun to write articles about possibility of getting human life control by robots and making destructive decisions against humankind life and environment.
On the other hand, I believe that there are more benefits for society to use advantage and progressive feature of robots. Firstly, it is clear that using robots in product lines, makes them more efficient and effective. As a result, total productivity of factories will definitely increase. It also will improve the quality of goods, so customers satisfaction will be attract. Secondly, as robots are more reliable in heavy duty missions, they can help rescue teams and assist military services in hazardous circumstances. For example in case of getting stuck in an ice storm on mountains, a robotic rescue team can operate more rapid, accurate and safe.
For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that advantages of robots for our future life are clearly more than its Probable disadvantages
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-05 | Hossein6329 | 78 | view |
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pie charts below show the area and current population of the seven continents as a percentage of the total 78
- The pie charts below show the area and current population of the seven continents as a percentage of the total 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...mployment rate to an impressive growth. Furthermore there are some other issues to be conce...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...o will improve the quality of goods, so customers satisfaction will be attract. Secondly,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50896057348 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99179043124 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0483421668 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.230769231 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241267055078 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07969897773 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353575391175 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137403847836 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425063978407 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.