Nowadays some individuals behave in an anti-society way, such as committing a crime. In general, it is the society to blame. What causes the anti-social behaviours of individuals? Who should be responsible for dealing with it?
It is unfortunate that in the midst of vast progress in every field of life there is also a growth in the anti-social behaviour. People commit crimes and have become less respectful of each other in the following paragraphs, I shall analyze some causes of this phenomenon and suggest some ways forward.
Today we live in an era of technology in which the whole Earth has shrunk and become a global village. Everybody is connected to everybody through telephone lines and the Internet but the warmth of relationships has taken a back seat. Most people have more than enough wealth, comfort and freedom but their hearts desire even more. To satisfy their hearts greed people choose unethical means such as committing petty and serious crimes: People have become selfish, isolated and indifferent and do not think twice before doing anything wrong
The changing family structure is another big cause of this phenomenon. Earlier, people lived in joint families and the grandparents were there to supervise the children. Now there are nuclear families in which both parents go out to work and children are left unattended in the hands of pervasive media like the TV and the internet. No one monitors what they watch and they see the programs full of violence and crime which makes them anti social. The pressure of consumerist society and peers also breeds anti social behaviour. Finally, unemployment is a cause of this phenomenon. The youth have a lot of energy and if it is not hamested in the right direction can make them go astray and commit crimes.
The individuals themselves, the society and the governments should deal with this situation together There are many solutions to this problem. To begin with, people have to learn to strike a balance between work and family life. Government should also fix the maximum hours a worker can work per week so that exploitation is not there in the job market. People should revert back to the old joint family system. The children would learn moral values and the elderly would be well looked after More and more employment opportunities should be created for the unemployed youth. Self employment can also be encourages.
Summing up, anti social behaviour and mutual lack of respect in today's times can be dealt with by taking simple measures and Individuals and goverments should collectively take these steps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-13 | hnhung | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | Ranjeet brar | 84 | view |
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online To what extend do you agree or disagree Give your opinion 61
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology repair their function Do you agree or disagree 95
- Do you feel artists like writers musicians and painters still have value in modern society Discuss 16
- In this past people used their free time in better ways as today To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- Some people think it is not necessary for adults to receive education in class Self study is a good way for them to study more effectively To what extend do You agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 593, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...s a cause of this phenomenon. The youth have a lot of energy and if it is not hamest...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, so, well, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99746835443 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59035718164 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589873417722 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.62792808 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.894736842 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256701030213 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667923786845 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673087158516 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13576847681 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559727435 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.