People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

In this tech-savvy era, people nowadays have enormous freedom on jobs in any place of the earth due to tremendous advancement in technology. And masses can travel thousands of miles from one place to another in just a few hours because of the marvelous mode of transportation. I, however, believe that these manifestations have myriad merits on individuals with the least demerits.

To commence with, in this cutting edge era people can do their work in any place of the world on time. Thus, the lives of the public became much easier than in the past. Earlier civilization had not that much freedom as technology was not that much developed before few decades. To epitome, people in the past preferred to work at office compulsory, however, this is not the case in current time. Moreover, air transportation became much cheaper and frequently available than in the past, therefore people can travel to any country in a shorter time. They can meet their loved one who lives far away in different countries.

On contrary, people are become more isolated from society due to more and more time spending on their work at home. Life of masses is very hectic in today's time and they are not able to spend their valuable time with family. Furthermore, individuals have to travel more because of their jobs and meetings as a result they do not get time for themselves. Additionally, the masses can not focus more on their work at home because of household chores.

To recapitulate, I reaffirm saying that due to extraordinary development in technology and transportation, the life of people is much easier and helpful. This phenomenon has more advantages than disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96797153025 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89645175308 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516014234875 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7402157264 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230472256473 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07799184578 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572220781987 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147133963789 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626240045943 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.