Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It goes with no doubt that, different facilities in a country need improvement. Accordingly, governments usually invest money in different fields. In this regard, some people believe that governments should spend more money on public transportation, however, others prefer this money on internet access improvement. I subscribe to the first idea for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To commence with, improving public transportations, help people reduce using private cars for in-city traveling. Therefore, gas consumption will reduce and results in fewer air pollutants producing. As a result, it can help to have a better living environment. My own experience is a compiling example of this. My father has asthma. About ten years ago, public transportation was not sufficiently provided, and everyone had to use its own car. this provided a huge amount of pollutants. Thus, my father was getting worse, and used to need more medications for this. But now, regarding the improvement of public transportation, he feels far better, also he takes less medicine.
Second, traffic jam in big cities is an obvious problem. Indeed, people from urban areas complain about the time they waste in both traffic and finding a parking lot. The promotion of public transportation can help it out and dramatically decrees traffic. To put it in a vivid picture, when people utilize public transportation instead of their private car, for example, a bus, about forty people can use one bus, as a result, there would be far fewer cars in street. For instance, In my city, Shiraz, where I mentioned above, this public transportations providing much better service, encouraged citizens to utilize it. Now, in consequence, there is no traffic in the city and lots of available parking lots. If the government had not spent this money on public transportation, there would have been huge problems transporting in city now.
In conclusion, considering the foregoing arguments, I firmly believe that the improvement of public transportation is more beneficial. It is because not only does public transportation help decreasing air pollution, but also it can help to decrease traffic and increasing available parking lots.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is difficult for teachers to be both popular liked by students and effective in helping students in learning Give reasons and specific examples to support your answer 75
- Your friend has the opportunity to study in either one of two majors fields of study Which one of the following two types of majors do you think is a better choice and why A major that would allow your friend to complete his or her studies and get a degre 60
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before Give specific examples and details to support your answer 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d, and everyone had to use its own car. this provided a huge amount of pollutants. T...
^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to decrease' or 'decrease'.
Suggestion: to decrease; decrease
...ot only does public transportation help decreasing air pollution, but also it can help to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31728045326 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14402160922 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57223796034 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7559036228 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3181818182 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0454545455 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225066869198 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607682393578 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571256615777 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141920894074 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316079672537 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d, and everyone had to use its own car. this provided a huge amount of pollutants. T...
^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to decrease' or 'decrease'.
Suggestion: to decrease; decrease
...ot only does public transportation help decreasing air pollution, but also it can help to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31728045326 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14402160922 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57223796034 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7559036228 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3181818182 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0454545455 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225066869198 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607682393578 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571256615777 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141920894074 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316079672537 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.