Both the listening and writing discuss the authenticity of the silver coin as historical evidence. They contradict each other from the following three perspectives.
First, the lecturer challenges the idea purposed by the writer that the great distance from Norse settlements to place coins discovered shows that there is no connection with the settlement. Instead, she contends that there are other objects that were found in great distance indicating that the Native American may be interested in collecting those objects including silver coins.
Second, the professor refutes the idea advocated by the author that Norse did not bring any silver coins as there are no other coins that have been found there. Nevertheless, she posits that Norse may need to pack up those coins and take them to North American during their trips. After that, they would have to go back to Europe and use them.
Third, the lecture cast doubt on the thought illustrated in the passage that silver coins were useless in North America so Norse would not bring them there. On the contrary, it indicates that those silver coins seem really beautiful and might be appealing to people in North America. Therefore, it is possible that they would like to trade with Norse by silver coins.
In conclusion, the talk rebuts the passage from three distinct aspects regarding whether the silver coins are historical evidence.
- TPO36 Hail pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field Over the last few decades a meth 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
- TPO42 Integrated writing 80
- Imagine you need to improve your performance in order to get better grades or higher work payment which way would you choose 1 doing more extra work or assignments that are required2 participate more actively or contributing your own idea more frequentl 90
- TPO 44 Integrated Writing Task 80
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 228 250
No. of Characters: 1142 1200
No. of Different Words: 123 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.886 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.009 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.399 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.727 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.929 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.392 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.696 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.179 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4