Famous attractions are always popular destinations for people who want to broaden their horizons. It is reasonable that people from all around the world are crowded in those places. Those places seem attractive, they aren't. The places that are not popular, in my opinion, will be more ideal for the following reasons.
In the first place, traveling in less crowded places enables visitors to relax and enjoy themselves. Without large crowds of visitors, the whole trip will be cleaner and quieter. It can easily create a peaceful atmosphere, which can help visitors to take their pressure off. For example, when we are taking a trip to a mountain where the roads are almost empty. You can not only breathe the fresh air but also listen to the voices of birds. The magnificent scenery on the hill makes it possible for you to empty your mind and stop thinking about the annoying affairs of either study or work. There is no doubt that after this trip, you will be in a good mood. Therefore, a trip to quiet places will give you a chance to release your stress in life.
Furthermore, there is no need for visitors to compete for resources during the traveling. By saying this I mean that the resources, including place, food, etc, are limited in the resorts. Getting access to those resources needs more effort made by visitors, which is beyond their initial purpose of travel. When having a meal in the restaurant, travelers may need to wait for an empty table because of the crowd of people. Also, if visitors want to take a picture in front of a monument, a large amount of time will be wasted on taking the best one in which no other people are in front of you. On the contrary, less competition on resources in less crowded travel places can guarantee a comfortable trip.
In conclusion, travel in some places that are not popular should be top on the priority list due to the environment and the satisfaction of the trips.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ces. Those places seem attractive, they arent. The places that are not popular, in my...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, for example, i mean, in conclusion, no doubt, in my opinion, on the contrary, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67741935484 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49124679132 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551319648094 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0120012929 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9473684211 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19853300613 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625112252994 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554284276833 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132804452881 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224785734891 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.