The given graph illustrates how Australian teenagers consumed fast food, namely pizza, fish and chips, and hamburgers from 1975 to 2000.
From the graph, it is clear that after the period of 25 years, hamburgers were the most favored fast food. It was followed by pizza while fish and chips gradually decreased.
In 1975, teenagers ate a few hamburgers and pizza, which was around 5 times, and 10 times orderly. Fish and chips were consumed popularity 100 times at the same time as burgers and pizza. However, in the year 1980, fish and chips dropped dramatically, which was about 83 times while hamburgers and pizza increased sharply with around 70 times for hamburgers.
From 1985 to 1995, while hamburgers, and pizza went up substantially to 100 times, and 85 times in order, there was a markedly fall in the consumption of fish and chips by Australian teens, which was 50 times. In the year 200, the number of hamburgers and pizza were tucked into by teens stabilized at 100 times, and 85 times, which was the same as 1995. Nevertheless, fish and chips went down gradually 38 times in 2000.
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('markedly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...times, and 85 times in order, there was a markedly fall in the consumption of fish and chips by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85263157895 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56686751981 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6897751751 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122261104123 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069702944859 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910660477958 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12141187404 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100929017232 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.