Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music, film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do.
Some people believe that artists have the right to interpret their ideas freely to the public through artwork without the government’s restricted laws. Although I partly agree with this viewpoint for several benefits, I opine that it may lead to negative impacts in a political way.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that many talents are found by encouraging them to express their artwork to the masses. They can make name for the country by spreading cultural heritage through their paintings or movies. In doing so, it attracts overseas tourists’ curiosity and thus, creating huge profits for the country’s tourism industry. That is America’s strategy while popularizing its culture by broadcasting Hollywood films around the world. On top of that, local citizens might also benefit from this trend. Being exposed to different artwork has always been considered beneficial for mental health since the artwork is a recreational tool. For instance, people watch films or listen to music as a way to entertain themselves and relieve stress.
On the other hand, a lack of restrictions can cause deviatory content in those platforms. Some films and songs are excessively related to politics, which tends to bring about divergence in political thinking. This provokes quarrels and tense between different political parties, resulting in wars and long-lasting arguments. In fact, the world has already witnessed many rebellions stemmed from the music and film industry. For example, some Hollywood movies raise the conflicts between China and America due to their sensational and sensitive political contents.
In conclusion, I approve that it is appropriate to loosen some restrictions in the artwork industry to improve talented artists. However, keeping adequate laws is also essential to deter rebellions and political tense causes by this field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-13 | monmon12345 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | gbach | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-26 | 81206Ecema | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-21 | Aarzoo kaur | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-21 | Aarzoo kaur | 56 | view |
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 89
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give 89
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home 84
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 56
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a political way" with adverb for "political"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ne that it may lead to negative impacts in a political way. On the one hand, it is undeniable t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48263888889 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83868766614 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.3415177347 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144408557655 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410832425403 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370121006337 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782700657691 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446016260623 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.