Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school Why is this Should this be taught in schools | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school.
Why is this?
Should this be taught in schools?

Few people consider that our kids have to be compelled to learn interpersonal skills such as verbal speeches and presentations in school curriculums. Personally, I am totally agreeing with teaching some of the speech’s dexterities at school for the following reasons. Our minors are going to be required the proficiency of declamation within the future like in university and at work, moreover the skillfulness of public speech set up our students mind and provides them self-confidence.

To begin with, most of the people will need to have a good way of speech in educational career and the professional one. All the students have tons of presentations at collage which they are required. As a result, teaching these tools of communication are essential. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Four years ago, I was at university, moreover I had a numerous dialogue that I had to do every day. Then, I worked at international company of medicine that I had to give a lecture at least twice a week in front of other competitive companies at international conventions. If I had not gotten these skills, I could not to perform any required tasks. In other word, adults should have the knowledge of speeches in an appropriate and professional way in the interest of having successful careers.

Furthermore, skills of conversations are necessary to improve children’s intelligence and aplomb. The Ministry of Education should set a variety of techniques to enhance discussion abilities of the students. For instance, Education Development Agency try to develop many techniques of speech to minor students due to they can easily acquire these experiences at such a young age. The more training and specialized techniques, the more confidence to practice. Finally, our students’ future is relying on what we teach them in schools like how to give lectures; therefore, explaining the importance of communications proficiency.

In conclusion, ability of public speech is one of the critical factors in the students’ life, should learn it at schools. Considering, it will be required in their careers in the future, moreover it will also be used for personality formation, and it improves their minds.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2021-10-06	mattayousak	83	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user mattayousak :

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ns in school curriculums. Personally, I am totally agreeing with teaching some of the speech’s dext...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ly, I am totally agreeing with teaching some of the speech’s dexterities at school for the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formation, and it improves their minds.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25770308123 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29882331249 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565826330532 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7161171769 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.277777778 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191530409868 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528092880912 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450877909546 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115068977549 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388546277089 0.0645574589148 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.