There is an obvious trend that employees spend more time working. Several reasons are leading to this long working time, but this will cause a lot of problems for the individual.
On the other hand, many reasons make people work over time. First of all, because the unemployment rate is increasing highly, people have to work hard or they will be removed. Agencies give individuals a compulsory amount of work that they have to spend more time to complete. In contrast, some companies want to encourage employees to work more, they will raise salary for extra-time work. Apparently, because staff members have the profit of the economy, they already work longer hours. They also can be appreciated by the boss and get more experience.
On the other hand, there are some opinions that debate about the issues of working over time. Because of a large amount of work, workers can be overloaded and stressful. This not only affects their physical health but also mental health. Lack of rest time makes humans exhausted then increases health problems such as: pain, lack of sleep, and even psychological effects. They will not have free time for activities or even time with family and friends. In addition, overload of working also shows the exploitation of man’s labour. In spite of the law of limited working time, some entrepreneurs still force employees to work longer hours. Therefore, this can continue happening with more and more workers.
In conclusion, working is necessary in a human's life. Working hard gives us more experience but working too much time can have many bad effects on our health. The best way is that people have to create a reasonable timetable to remain their best status.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...n conclusion, working is necessary in a humans life. Working hard gives us more experi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, so, still, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01048951049 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51272131352 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541958041958 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0096931555 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.4210526316 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0526315789 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252917049278 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825834191639 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646448136997 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167449240062 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170831833419 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.