The golden frog is a small bright-yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog's critical life functions, such as breathing. Conservationists have proposed a few solutions to the golden frog's fungus problem.
Bacterial Protection
First, scientists have identified a natural enemy of the fungus: a type of bacterium. This bacterium produces a chemical that kills fungal cells. Scientists think that they may be able to introduce colonies of this bacterium to the skin of golden frogs. The bacterial colonies would then protect the frogs against the fungus infection
Breeding Frogs in Captivity
Second, researchers are considering the possibility of breeding golden frogs in captivity and then releasing them in the wild to replenish wild populations The golden frog can develop disease-free in captivity; where it is isolated from the fungus When golden frogs bred in captivity are released in habitats where wild golden frogs have died out, the frogs bred in captivity will give rise to a healthy, fungus-free population.
A Natural Defense
Third, it is possible that golden frogs w川 overcome the threat posed by the fungus without human intervention. Some golden frogs have what seems to be a natural defense against the fungus. When infected, they increase their body temperature, which slows down the growth of the fungus If this ability to resist the fungal infection spreads among the golden frog population as a whole, the frog population is likely to overcome the crisis and start increasing again.
Both the reading passage and the listening discuss few solutions to the golden frog's fungus problem. The former introduces three possible solutions to this problem, but the latter contradicts each of these points.
First of all, the author of the reading passage claims that bacterial protection will solve the golden frog's fungus problem. Nevertheless, the lecturer contends that it will probably not work because a chemical that kills fungal cells which is produced by the bacterium does not long last. The bacterium produces this just in early time.
Second of all, the writer of the reading passage argues that breeding frogs in Captivity will solve the golden frog's fungus problem. Notwithstanding, the audio maintains that if we release breeding forgs in captivity, then wild golden forg will died out. Morever, the new golden frog soon infected and they also die.
Third of all, the reading passage state that a natureal defense will solve the problem of golden frog's fungus problem. Nonetheless, the lecturer declares that it has big drawback, when the golden frog increase their body temperature, it will have to spend a lot of energy. As a result, Golden frog will become weak and they are more likely to catch other disease.
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 16
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- Most culture encourages individuals to sacrifice a large part of their personalities in order to be like other people Thus most people are afraid to think or behave differently because they do not want to be excluded 50
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its heroines 50
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...ing discuss few solutions to the golden frogs fungus problem. The former introduces t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...terial protection will solve the golden frogs fungus problem. Nevertheless, the lectu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...rogs in Captivity will solve the golden frogs fungus problem. Notwithstanding, the au...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'die'
Suggestion: die
...n captivity, then wild golden forg will died out. Morever, the new golden frog soon ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...efense will solve the problem of golden frogs fungus problem. Nonetheless, the lectu...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...solve the problem of golden frogs fungus problem. Nonetheless, the lecturer decla...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, then, third, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13300492611 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48531809584 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576354679803 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7175923378 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7272727273 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204796295915 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942440633512 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690844277124 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135560618493 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446885968968 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.