Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
some people argue that profuse availability of information in internet can create a various negative impacts on society. They cite that prolific information can cause distaction, health problems and individual, particularly children could watch uncensored contents such as pornographic, which may inhibit their physiological growing to support their point. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that internet provides a copious amount of valuable information. I will support my view with two reasons.
To begin with, internet serves to people as an enormous library that can be easily accesses. One can get any information that one needs at any time even from home. For instance, sometimes I bet with my friends in any subject. Before the internet, we were struggling to find the truth for long time with much efforts. But now, the truth is ready after we log into my computer or smartphone from home. so, the argument doesn't exist for long time. It is important to access the internet easily because student need to explore different fields and resouces to enhance not only knowledge but also, them to intensifies their consciousness and realization. Thus, internet serves the material easily.
Secondly, internet provides gigantic precious information because it helps students to learn useful lifeskill. It is the era of innovation and technology. Information technology in internet let students to encourgage themselves in modern learning. For example, it assists students in solving complex problems, critical and analytical thinking, developing different forms of communication and leadership skills etc. It is privotal to learn valuable and practical lifeskill because without lifeskill one cannot compete in this globalization world. Therefore, internet helps young students to learn valuable lifeskill.
To sum up, the issue of whether internet boost the vaulable information or not is complex. Some have suggested that prolific information could hazard the people because uncensored site may hamper the brain of students and inhibit in their physiological growth. Nevertheless, I stilll contend that voluminous information helps student to learrn life-long skills and helps to easily accessible to a board range of resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
some people argue that profuse availability ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'impact'?
Suggestion: impact
... internet can create a various negative impacts on society. They cite that prolific inf...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ng to find the truth for long time with much efforts. But now, the truth is ready af...
^^^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...to my computer or smartphone from home. so, the argument doesnt exist for long tim...
^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... smartphone from home. so, the argument doesnt exist for long time. It is important to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63742690058 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97095592669 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.6073318842 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8095238095 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09523809524 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279359179177 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782795855686 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057511104709 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167979241969 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719390613471 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.