Plastic bags are terrible for the environment. They should be banned everywhere.
It is critically important that we save the environment from the terrible effects of plastic bags. Personally, I believe that plastic bags should be banned entirely across the world. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, plastic is not a biodegradable substance. If we burry plastic under the ground, then it would take millions of years to dismantle such a horrible kind of material. After the industrial revolution, there had been a significant rise in the usage of plastic. More and more companies are involved in packaging their products in plastic bags so that people could be attracted easily. My personal example is a compelling illustration of this. My mother used to utilize a cloth bag when I was a kid. With the advent of new malls into my city, whenever my mother used to go for shopping, she would not carry her cloth bag. Rather, she would expect the mall staff to provide a plastic bag to carry the goods. This went on for more than a decade until the government imposed ban on plastic bags.
Furthermore, plastic bags are harmful to our health. Whenever we put food items such as vegetables or partially eaten food into a plastic bag, the particles of plastic get binded with the food. If someone consumes the contaminated food, then they can probably develop cancer. Such harmful effects are not known by public, and therefore, giant food manufacturing companies are taking benefit of the ignorance of people. Banning plastic bags is something which can be proved to be a nightmare for large businesses. Food manufacturing companies does not care for the problems caused by plastic to fulfill their goal of earning money out of destroying the planet and playing with the health of common people. For instance, after the ban imposed by the government, the officials have to create a portal where the companies can register to get their packaging verified. By doing so, they can continue to use plastic in their packaging if they have an approval from the government. So, we can see that the banning of plastic was only for name sake. At the end, money is something that matters and to oppose such kind of attitudes, banning and boycotting plastic is the only way left for the general public. It could be done by spreading awareness about the issue.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that plastic bags should be banned. This is because plastic pollutes the environment and it has harmful effects on our health.
- The populations of many fish species are rapidly disappearing due to overfishing and pollution There are many ways to address this issue and one of the most popular is aquaculture also known as fish farming Raising fish in a controlled environment has man 68
- Many people are trying to reduce the amount of meat that they eat but they still crave meat products Scientists have recently developed methods to create simulated meats from vegetable protein that have the appearance taste and texture of real meat to sat 78
- Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave 70
- In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 76
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1185, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ng plastic is the only way left for the general public. It could be done by spreading awarenes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83606557377 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65602268523 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510538641686 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7172983756 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.08 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.24 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425411577734 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118770040834 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879359413083 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283604702488 0.150856017488 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521496212439 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.