The number of poor people around the world is constantly on the rise these days. Some people attach that the government ought to concern about their citizens before others. From my point of view, I totally agree with this viewpoint for many reasons, described in the following essay before the conclusion is reached.
The principal reason that supports my view is that the government could not handle all the problems in the world. In other words, there are a plethora of citizens on this planet who seek for help. Thus, the rescue process would be more efficient if the government start from their own country. The covid-19 situation is a perfect example in this case. As we can see in the present, every country has a policy to protect their citizens from infection in order to solve the problem as fast as possible. On the contrary, if one government try to help every person in the world altogether, the cross-infection would be out of control because it is a large scale of people.
However, it is undeniable that in some countries, the government do not have the ability to solve their own issues. Helping other countries are not a bad action if their people are already safe. For instance, as I mentioned before, in the Covid-19 situation, the USA have the ability to produce the vaccine. After they rescue their own citizens, they also distribute their vaccine to other countries.
In conclusion, although helping other individuals is a good thing to do, I personally believe that the rescue process ought to start from our own country before others.
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph shows the imformation about the dubai gold sales 2002 for 12 month in 2002 in millions of dirhams 79
- Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this case. As we can see in the present, every country has a policy to protect th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85074626866 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59154080815 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544776119403 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4432965126 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261233639745 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881629141274 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597850952987 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150244146442 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309368176054 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.