The bar chart below illustrates five different industries’ percentage share of Brazil’s economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029.
The bar chart illustrates the information about proportion of five major industry sectors Finance, Food processing, Manufacturing, tourism and fossil fuels contribution in Brazil's economy from 2009 to 2019 and prediction about 2029.
Overall, finance was leading sector in Brazil's economy and also the trend show rise through the time. Food processing and oil, coal, and gas are fluctuating while others show reduction in their contribution in economy.
Finance had 30% participation in 2009 which was increased in 2019 around 5% and contribution will reach at 40% in 2029. Food processing shows heavy fluctuation over the time. In 2009, food processing was contributed 10% and after a decade it was doubled however in 2029, it will reduce at 2009 level. Manufacturing sector is shrinking from about 20% in 2009 and reduced 5% in decade and future contribution will 5% in 2029. Tourism was 25% in 2009 and decreased 5% in ten years and in future it will stabilize their share in economy. Fossil fuel had increased at 30% in 2009 however in future it will contribute 25 % same of level of 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-24 | minhhh123 | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | huynh truc mai | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-11 | Aung | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | Elena Phan | 81 | view |
| 2022-01-26 | Ruxsora | 82 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03846153846 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85515857434 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2869431473 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202684286553 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862409861199 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838783312825 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156849993803 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107541102381 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.