Some people, especially in the Asian culture, believe that the student should admire their teachers and should politely take the lectures from them. However, in my opinion, students should evaluate the performance of their teachers because this is not only helpful for them but also helpful for teachers.
To begin with, evaluating the teachers’ performance helps students to pick the best class among many classes. Rates and reviews about the teachers’ teaching skills and lecture qualities will help students to choose the most suitable classes for them. For example, when I was in my university years, I was asked to evaluate every class that I have attended. At every end of semesters, the student council of my department gathered information from students’ evaluations and ranked the professors and their lectures. Thanks to the ranking list from them, students were able to choose the lectures and professor wisely for the next semester.
On top of that, the evaluation of students will stimulate the teachers to improve their lecture qualities and teaching skills. If a teacher got the lowest rank among other teachers, this can be used as a motivation to develop his or her ability. To be specific, when I was a high school student, my school actually utilized this system to meet the students’ preferences. Even though most teachers at my school were excellent, there were apparent gaps between each teachers’ class quality. The class of the most high-rated teacher was extremely popular so that a waiting list was made by the students who failed to register in his class. In contrast, some teachers’ classes that failed to get reputation from their students were empty and eventually closed before the end of the semester. This stimulated unpopular teachers to develop their lectures and teaching methods. As a result, this evaluation increased the overall quality of my high school classes and give positive effects to both students and teachers.
To sum up, rating the performance of teachers is beneficial because it helps students to choose better classes and also motivates teachers to develop their abilities. In this regard, I strongly insist that students should evaluate the performance of their teachers.
- When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more effective to study in a group of students than to study alone 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lecture Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussion Which do you prefer 73
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ial because it helps students to choose better classes and also motivates teachers to ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uate the performance of their teachers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, for example, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24791086351 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71009884492 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495821727019 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.726293782 48.9658058833 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.823529412 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247290780807 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102831212124 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400919469764 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181322861437 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222518715623 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.