In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Art is the form in which an artist can skillfully express his or her thoughts. The argument in the prompt argues, for any art to have recognition, it has to be understood by most people. Although to recognize the value of the art, one must understand to appreciate it, it might not be true in every case. Hence I mostly disagree with the claim for two reasons.
Admittedly, to be recognized as good art, people have to understand it well in the first place. For any art, be it a movie or a song, one has to be able to identify elements that make the art unique and special. Take for example the movie "Interstellar". Although during its initial run in the first week of its release, the film did not perform hugely at the box office, people who watched the movie realized its values as one of the best space movies ever made and they soon began to popularise the movie by telling their friends and family. Soon, the film that had a dry run in the first phase, went on to register as the second-highest grosser of all time. So, unless people spread a positive word about the art, it might not have the recognition, and for the "initial fire", some people should be able to recognize and understand its value.
However, in the modern world that is filled with numerous languages and with the advent of social media and the internet, recognizing a good art form in any place has been a piece of cake. Once the art got its initial recognition locally, people can make it viral over the night using their social media. For example, the famous pop song "Gangnam Style" that was released in the early 2010s made a revolutionary impact throughout the world without any language barrier. People from all over the world started to listen to the song albeit mostly they have no clue of what the song meant. The same phenomenon can be also observed in the recent french song "Despacito" which later went on to create a record for the most-watched video on the famous social media platform "YouTube ". So, even if the piece of art is incomprehensible to many people, art can still have recognition.
Moreover, people will themselves have the eagerness to learn about the unknown art once it has become popular enough. For example, consider arguably the world's best painting "Monalisa" by Leonardo Da Vinci. At a very first glance by any clear-headed mind might that does not know the value of the painting might not reveal the greatness and the depth of the masterpiece. But upon knowing the value of the art, and looking keenly into the picture again, one can truly appreciate the value.
In conclusion, any form of art, be it a song, movie, or novel, to have recognition and merit, need not be understood by most people. Once the art has become popular enough, people will have the enthusiasm to learn about the work and can appreciate its value.
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate Another advantage is that housing costs in 53
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understand appreciating'.
Suggestion: understand appreciating
...ecognize the value of the art, one must understand to appreciate it, it might not be true in every case....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...it, it might not be true in every case. Hence I mostly disagree with the claim for tw...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho watched the movie realized its values as one of the best space movies ever mad...
^^^
Line 6, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d that is filled with numerous languages and with the advent of social media and ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77120315582 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90359155611 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479289940828 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1630534925 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.954545455 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0454545455 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394220456627 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123779311412 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867315435798 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239701062896 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763693302862 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understand appreciating'.
Suggestion: understand appreciating
...ecognize the value of the art, one must understand to appreciate it, it might not be true in every case....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...it, it might not be true in every case. Hence I mostly disagree with the claim for tw...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho watched the movie realized its values as one of the best space movies ever mad...
^^^
Line 6, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d that is filled with numerous languages and with the advent of social media and ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77120315582 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90359155611 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479289940828 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1630534925 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.954545455 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0454545455 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394220456627 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123779311412 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867315435798 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239701062896 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763693302862 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.