In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
The question of whether a work of art, be it a film, novel or poem must be understandable to most of the people to have merit is a complex and subjective matter. For broader appreciation of arts, accessibility and understandability is a crucial requirement but establishing equity between merit and the understandability of an art by majority oversimplifies the diversity of arts.
First and foremost, a work of art is a medium of communication through which artists express their emotions and thoughts. Through understanding an art, people form different places can related to different cultures, norms and disciplines which broader the intellectual ability of people. For example, the novels or films on romances or family relations has a great impact on making people understand the cultures of different parts of the world and form a connection between diverse cultures.
However, there can be some works which are made to challenge the accepted notions or put forward new ideas. This can lead to such works which are unrelatable and difficult to be understood by most of the people. For instance, there are many poems or novels that have introduced revolutionary ideas but understood by people much later than it was produced. There can be diverse opinions about a single work, so connecting the merit of an artform with understanding of that is a bit much.
Furthermore, A variety of artworks are present that require prior knowledge to understand them such as musics have variety of forms that are likable by different groups of people and it do not reduce the merit of the artwork. Even if an art is accessible by broad audience, it can be difficult for the artist to make his work understandable to all if the audience has not the prior knowledge required.
In conclusion, art should be accessible and understood by broad audience as it helps to extend people's boundary of thoughts. But linking the art's merit to people understandability is very oversimplified notion as the art is a very diverse field. Ultimately, the work's merit should be accessed based on it's ability to provoke emotion and opinions though it is understood by a smaller audience.
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 83
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 83
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether a work of art, be it a film, novel or p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion between diverse cultures. However, there can be some works which are made t...
^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...le by different groups of people and it do not reduce the merit of the artwork. Ev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03342618384 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1684327637 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490250696379 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5995268026 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.071428571 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420239287337 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152588234418 0.0831039109588 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104704997055 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253687395798 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105848028357 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.