We are now in a climate emergency that fossil fuels are undeniably one of the primary contributors. The need for renewable and clean alternatives is growing more urgent than ever. For this reason, many nations have increased momentum to the development of new renewable and clean energy. In my opinion, a full transition will not happen overnight, but such changes would create crucial environmental, social, and economic benefits.
On the one hand, the shift toward alternative types of energy would probably put a financial burden on governments and businesses as they will have to invest millions of dollars in purchasing and developing new facilities for harnessing solar, wind, and hydro-electric power. This is the rationale why many countries, especially poor economies, are still unable to use this power source. Although the supply is finite, oil is plentiful and the technology to extract it continues to improve, making it evermore economical to produce and use. The same is also largely true for natural gas. While transportation is the biggest energy-consuming sector, which comes from petroleum, renewables, mainly in the form of biofuels, accounts for 5 percent. So many people believe that switching to renewable energy only makes an infinitesimal change.
However, I still support the worthwhile investment of alternative energies because of theirs remarkable merits. First, there is a growing concern that emission from fossil fuels contributes to continuous rise in average global temperatures, which may prompt natural habitat destruction and sea-level rise. And even if oil, coal, and natural gas are available, we couldn’t rely on them forever because they are nonrenewable and they can naturally replenish. In addition, despite the first gigantic investment, renewable energy plants need less maintenance. Since they are using sunshine, wind, stream, and biomasses, they don’t need refuel. This is a compelling plus for year-round regions, including the South of Vietnam, where there has been a boom of household rooftop solar panel in recent years.
In conclusion, there have been several barriers to moving out of fossil fuel age regardless of some signs of progress. It seems to me that we should be phasing out fossil fuels in the next few decades while developing new technologies to lessen the environmental impacts of these old types of energy.
- Some people say that it is necessary to use animals for testing the medicines intended for human beings others however think it is cruel and unnecessary Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Topic Fossil Fuels such as coal oil and natural gas is extensively in many countries which cause harm to the environment The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is being encouraged in many countries Is this a positive or ne 89
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world However people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy solar energy and so on Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Topic Fossil Fuels such as coal oil and natural gas is extensively in many countries which cause harm to the environment The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is being encouraged in many countries Is this a positive or ne 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 633, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[4]
Message: Did you mean 'to refuel'?
Suggestion: to refuel
... stream, and biomasses, they don’t need refuel. This is a compelling plus for year-rou...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l impacts of these old types of energy.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44623655914 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00101150713 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637096774194 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9149617827 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227501774894 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616471127558 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472787439854 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12047053908 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557813863041 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.